Non-Surgical & Injectables in Ontario

Patients consistently report feeling at ease with Dr. Ayeni from consultation through recovery, praising her responsiveness, skill, and genuine care. She personally follows up on concerns and sends replacement compression garments when needed. The team, clinic design, and aftercare set this practice apart, though one review flagged poor bedside manner. Breast augmentation, body contouring, and tummy tucks dominate the feedback, with injectables and hydrafacials also mentioned. Several patients travelled locally to avoid Toronto clinics. Multiple reviews highlight her work on body confidence after major life changes like childbirth.

Aliya at Ace of Spades earns strong trust through unhurried consultations and results that feel like the client's best self. Most reviewers praise her warmth, her willingness to explain each step, and the natural balance of fillers and injectables. One client spent over $1000 on Botox across multiple sessions with minimal forehead improvement and felt unsupported when raising concerns. The business lists dermal fillers, Botox, microneedling with exosomes, and other injectables on its website. Aliya is consistently named and described as the provider. Clients report quick appointments and accessible pricing, with one mentioning a discount received.

All 12 reviews are five-star. Patients consistently praise Dr. Ronald Levine's surgical technique, especially for breast augmentation and explants, and the entire team's attentiveness from consultation through recovery. Staff members Anny, Christy, and Elisha are named for responsiveness and warmth. One patient noted minimal pain post-surgery and straightforward recovery.

Positive experiences centre on skilled nurses (especially Elizabeth and Naz) who deliver gentle treatments with meticulous attention to comfort and natural results. However, multiple recent complaints allege aggressive product sales, inflated pricing compared to online alternatives, refusal to address failed treatments or defective products without demanding more money, and unresponsive customer service when issues arise.

Patients consistently credit Dr. Brown with exceptional surgical results and life-changing outcomes, particularly in breast work. His approach combines technical skill with genuine care: he listens closely during consultation, explains procedures clearly, and maintains engaged follow-up from surgery day through recovery. The team (staff like Krysta, Melanie, Paulina, and aesthetician Taylor) is praised for warmth and organization. However, a small number flag poor results with facial injectables and concern about the practice's response to complaints.

Many clients praise the clinic's thorough consultations, gentle staff, and welcoming atmosphere, especially during initial appointments. However, recurring complaints about product potency, inconsistent pricing, poor post-treatment communication, and a sales-driven culture create frustration despite strong initial experiences. The clinic offers injectable and non-surgical body treatments. Staff like nurse Selena are frequently mentioned for care and gentleness. Several reviews raise concerns about Botox lasting shorter than expected and possible dilution, alongside difficult payment-processing, weak aftercare guidance, and a disconnect between pre-sale effort and post-treatment support.

Most patients report excellent care from specific providers (Dr. Greenspoon, Claira Rose, Emily, Chanel) in a clean, welcoming setting. However, experiences vary sharply by provider. Some face rushed consultations, dismissive or condescending doctors, staff who perform treatments they admit they're not qualified for, and poor communication when conditions fall outside the clinic's typical scope. Quality feels dependent on which provider you see.

All eight reviewers gave five stars, praising the surgeons (Rajan, Jindal, Tutino) for thoroughness and professionalism, and staff for warmth. Patients value the detailed pre-procedure explanations and calm, welcoming atmosphere throughout their visits.

Most people return repeatedly to Teresa for lip filler and Botox, citing her knowledge, honest advice against over-treatment, and skill at natural results. The few complaints centre on rushed visits and a strict cancellation policy that one client felt was applied aggressively.

Five-star reviewers praise Dr. De Kleer's surgical skill, clear communication, and Michele's expertise with injectables; post-op care from nurses like Karen and Nurse Gottwald is frequently highlighted. However, one-star reviewers report serious surgical botches (breast reduction requiring in-home nursing, submental liposuction causing new lumps 1.5 years later), dismissal of complications, and upselling of treatments that caused permanent scarring, with management refusing to address complaints. The clinic excels in non-surgical services like CoolSculpting and laser treatments for engaged patients. Surgery appears to carry significant risk with this practice, based on multiple accounts of avoidable harm and lack of accountability.

Many patients report Dr. Elahi delivers precise, natural-looking results and takes genuine time during consultations. His team, when engaged, earns consistent praise for warmth and attentiveness. However, a meaningful minority describe serious complications (botched breast lifts, weight regain after liposuction) that were not adequately explained beforehand or remedied afterward. Office staff interactions-particularly with Samantha-have left several patients feeling dismissed or unsupported during critical decision points. Specific procedures praised include rhinoplasty, breast reduction, and scar revision, with reviewers noting minimal pain and smooth recovery. But the gap between surgical skill and pre-operative communication, combined with handling of adverse outcomes, creates genuine hesitation for prospective patients considering revision cases or more involved procedures.

Most visits result in smooth appointments with skilled staff who listen carefully to goals and deliver subtle, natural-looking outcomes. A few patients hit serious friction: slow response times on paid services and mishandled interactions have soured recent experiences, though the bulk of activity centers on laser hair removal, injectables, and chemical peels delivered with genuine care.

Most patients report excellent outcomes with careful consultation, minimal complications, and warm care throughout recovery. A small but serious group experienced surgical errors, particularly over-aggressive eyelid work and filler mishaps, followed by dismissal of concerns and no meaningful revision options offered. Most surgeries here are rhinoplasty and eyelid procedures. When things go well, results feel natural and staff stay involved post-op. The main caveat: eyelid surgery carries documented risk of over-removal, and the clinic has not clearly addressed these failures in public responses.

Patients consistently praise Dr. Adibfar's surgical expertise and the clinic's warm, professional team across rhinoplasty, breast, and body procedures. Esthetician services (Fractora, Forma, laser treatments) and post-operative care like massage therapy and lymphatic drainage draw strong loyalty. One complaint from several years back cited refused post-op appointments and clinic understaffing during high-demand periods.

Most patients describe transformative experiences with McLean's warm, attentive team and skilled surgeons, particularly for gender-affirming top surgery. One significant negative review documented surgical complications (asymmetry, nipple stretching, dog ears) that the patient felt were neither discussed beforehand nor adequately addressed during follow-up, tempting buyers to probe pre-op conversations about expected outcomes and revision policies.

Anna and her team deliver personalized skincare treatments that reviewers say noticeably improve their complexion. Many have been returning for years, citing her expertise and the calm clinic environment.

Surgical patients consistently report strong results and excellent bedside manner from senior doctors and nursing staff. However, the clinic struggles with laser treatments, long appointment delays, and occasional serious complications; some patients cite permanent injury and unresolved complaints about refunds or compensation.

Most patients report Dr. Maleki combines technical skill with genuine care, delivering natural-looking blepharoplasty and fat transfer results with strong follow-up support. A minority describe major misalignment between consultation goals and actual surgical outcome, along with dismissive staff responses when challenging results. The clinic's non-surgical offerings (laser, Botox, fillers) and surgical aftercare earn consistent praise. Named staff like Christina, Kay, Sunny, and Hatel draw specific mention for responsiveness and skill. Two detailed negative reviews cite aggressive skin excision beyond agreed limits and misleading laser package sales tactics.

Reviewers consistently praise Dr. Shahram and the team for delivering natural-looking results and professional service. All eight five-star reviews highlight technical skill, friendly atmosphere, and patient confidence in the outcomes.

Most clients praise Katie's gentleness and skill, particularly for HIFU, laser treatments, and lip enhancement, with many returning repeatedly. However, several report zero results on Botox despite multiple visits and full payment, along with disputes over Groupon pricing and rushed service that left them out of pocket with no improvement. Strengths centre on non-surgical procedures like tattoo removal, skin rejuvenation, and fat freezing. Weaknesses emerge with injectables: Botox clients describe feeling injected water and encountering pressure to upgrade package prices mid-visit. Flexible scheduling and quick responses offset concerns about cancellations without alternatives.

All 26 Google reviews are five-star. Patients consistently praise the clean, calm environment and Joy's skill with injectables and laser treatments. Botox, dermal fillers, PRP, and laser hair removal deliver results that build confidence, with staff making nervous first-timers feel at ease.

Staff are genuinely knowledgeable and attentive, with follow-up care that goes beyond expectation. Results are visible across skin treatments and injectables, though scheduling can be restrictive and some customers report unmet expectations after upselling.

Dr. Golger's clinic earns consistent five-star praise for breast augmentation, reduction, and lift work, with patients noting his honesty about what's possible and his willingness to revise cases free if needed. Staff members Josie and Tammi are mentioned by name for their warmth and support throughout the process. However, gynecomastia and body contouring patients report significant regret: inadequate gland removal, poor liposuction results, visible indentation, and sagging that persists years later. Several cite major pricing shifts mid-way and one patient notes being pressured into liposuction against their stated preference.

Most patients report smooth procedures and excellent bedside manner, with Dr. Weinberg earning particular praise for explaining options clearly and creating comfort during treatment. Results often exceed expectations, and staff interactions shape the positive experience. However, a significant minority cite substantial problems: long waits at appointments, forgotten in exam rooms, unanswered complaints after botched work, and complaints dismissed post-surgery despite complications including infection and chronic pain. The gap between best and worst experiences is stark. Five-star reviewers consistently mention aesthetic precision and supportive recovery, while those who struggled faced administrative lapses and unaddressed medical concerns. Wait times and follow-up care appear inconsistent across visits, suggesting operational gaps even when clinical skill is strong.

Patients report Dr. Atiyah delivers skilled surgical results and genuine care through most interactions, with Nicole consistently praised for warm, responsive support. However, a handful describe him as dismissive during consultations, and one family experienced tension over work-injury documentation and perceived insensitivity, raising questions about consistency in patient respect across complex cases.

Dr. Sleightholm and his team deliver polished consultations and skillful minor procedures, earning consistent praise for the clinic's cleanliness and staff warmth. However, a minority of patients report unresolved breast surgery complications, inadequate follow-up, and dismissive responses to concerns, creating tension between the positive routine experience and serious gaps when outcomes disappoint. Strengths cluster around liposuction, lipoma removal, tummy tucks, and non-surgical work (facials, skin treatments). Staff members Cristina, Brigitte, Priscilla, and Richa are named frequently for attentive care. The practice states it was founded in 1994 and holds Royal College board certification. Caution is warranted for major breast procedures, where communication and accountability appear inconsistent.

Dr. Boyd's clinic earns strong marks for thoughtful consultation, skilled work, and a team that makes patients feel heard and cared for. One reviewer waited over a year for a revision appointment with unresolved concerns, tempering the otherwise consistent praise for professionalism and results.

Most reviewers praise the clinic's friendly staff, clean space, and visible results across laser and injectable treatments. Long-term clients highlight realistic consultations and skilled technicians like Heather and Allen. However, a notable minority report poor communication during intake, rough handling during procedures, and missing aftercare instructions, with one patient citing pain and excessive product usage by a specific injector. Services span laser hair removal, leg vein treatment, chemical peels, injectables (Botox, fillers), and facials. The clinic has locations in North York and Downtown, with staff availability appearing consistent. Concerns centre on inconsistent bedside manner and procedure prep rather than facility quality.

All four reviews rate the clinic five stars. Dr. Weinberg and his team earn consistent praise for technical skill, clear communication, and natural outcomes across filler, reconstruction, and body contouring procedures.

Strong majority of patients report excellent results and comfort under Dr. Gallant's care, with particular praise for body contouring and breast surgery outcomes. However, several reviewers describe insensitive consultations and unaddressed post-operative complications, suggesting inconsistency in patient care and communication.

Most long-term patients praise the expertise of Drs. Edstrom and Lemckert, along with attentive staff follow-up. However, recent reviews flag inconsistent reception service, unresponsive staff to voicemails, and complaints about treatment failures and confusing appointment policies. Evidence is limited to 27 Google reviews, with a stark divide between five-star loyalty and one/two-star frustration over operational friction.

Staff earn consistent praise for warmth and attentiveness across consultations, recovery, and follow-up. However, two older reviews flag communication breakdowns and lost records; one patient waited two years without response on a revision after a surgeon left.

Dr. Caron earns consistent five-star ratings for professional work and natural results. Review evidence is limited, but mentions her skill with current techniques and commitment to avoiding overdone appearances.

Five-star reviews praise Dr. Brownrigg's rhinoplasties and non-surgical work (Botox noted as consistently excellent), plus scar-prevention expertise. One-star reviews center on rhinoplasties that looked unchanged from pre-surgery, despite 3D imaging promises and thousands spent. Patients reported steroid injections offered but ineffective, and say concerns were dismissed rather than addressed constructively. Evidence is thin overall: detail limited to recent rhinoplasty failures, Botox praise, facelift satisfaction, and reconstructive breathing improvements.

All ten reviews rate Aestheticare five stars. Patients return for Dr. Lozenski's refusal to over-treat and her staff's warmth; acne and skin concerns improve markedly with peels and IPL.

Strong track record on minor procedures like cysts and moles, with patients praising clean technique and patient comfort. However, a significant subset report serious problems: one cyst regrew after incomplete removal, another keloid worsened, and an older review alleges major body contouring failures. Wait times and receptionist responsiveness vary widely.

Dr. Bell and his team earn consistent praise for breast augmentation, facial surgery, and laser treatments, with patients particularly crediting Shelby for non-surgical work and the staff for making them feel at ease. However, hair transplant reviews reveal a severe divide: several patients report significant complications, pressure during consultation, technician-led procedures, and being charged full price for fewer grafts than promised, with lasting physical and financial consequences.

Most patients report strong results and warm staff interactions, particularly from named team members Liz, Diana, Shannon, and Jenn. However, a handful of older reviews flag inconsistent bedside manner during consultations and revision surgeries, especially with ear procedures.

Most satisfied patients praise Dr. Hynes' skill, the staff's warmth (especially Karen at front desk), and smooth healing. Yet serious gaps emerge: one patient experienced asymmetry after abdominoplasty with zero follow-up from the clinic despite repeated contact; phone lines are consistently busy or divert to an unrelated device seller; and complications go unaddressed. Past reviews glow, but recent ones flag a stark decline in accountability and communication. Since review evidence is limited, note that detail provided here reflects only these 17 reviews.

The clinic divides sharply. Patients treated by Dr. Rathee or in shorter-wait visits praise genuine listening and effective treatment; Dr. Mani Raman receives consistent complaints of rudeness, dismissiveness, and appointments that last 3-5 minutes despite 40-minute-plus waits. The core frustration is the gap between long wait times and very brief time with the doctor. Staff and front-desk issues compound the problem. Booking calls go unanswered, appointment administration makes errors, and the clinic seems aware of wait times but takes no meaningful action. A few patients report pleasant, punctual experiences, but they are far outnumbered by those who feel unheard, rushed, and disrespected.

One five-star review supports this Aurora clinic. Review detail is limited, so specifics about staff skill, results, or experience remain unknown. Their website lists medical aesthetics, facials, body contouring, permanent makeup, and head spa services.

Most patients praise the clinic's cleanliness, friendly staff, and skin treatment outcomes, especially for lasers and peels. A consistent minority report poor phone service and disappointing in-person experiences, with some feeling rushed or unwelcome during consultations.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Review evidence is limited. The business holds a 3.0 average across 2 Google reviews with a sharp split between five-star and one/two-star ratings, signaling inconsistent experiences.

One patient reported a successful minor procedure that boosted confidence. However, most reviews describe arrogant behavior, botched cosmetic work that worsened the original condition, refusal to refund, and pricing confusion. Evidence is limited but strongly negative.

Nearly every recent reviewer describes an inaccessible, dismissive clinic. Phone lines go unanswered, voicemails are ignored, and when patients do reach Dr. Gupta, many report he rushes appointments, dismisses concerns, or delays critical medical results by months. One patient waited six months for a cancer diagnosis; another had a botched biopsy. Only a handful of older reviews praise professionalism, but the overwhelming pattern is poor communication and lack of care.

Long waits, dismissive care, and hostile administrative encounters dominate feedback. When seen, the doctor can perform thorough exams, but reviews describe inadequate explanations, rushed appointments, and a receptionist staff that many found rude or disrespectful. Post-operative pain went unmanaged in some cases. The 2.3 rating reflects severe dissatisfaction across most reviewers.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Limited review evidence available for Verso Surgery. The business operates as a fully licensed facility in Old Toronto, offering facial and body procedures including facelift, rhinoplasty, breast augmentation, and non-surgical options.

Review evidence is limited. Verso Surgery Centre operates from North York with services spanning facial procedures (facelift, rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty), breast surgery, and injectables. Their website claims 20+ years of operating history under Dr. Jack Kolenda and a licensed, state-of-the-art facility.

Limited review evidence available. The business claims board certification in facial plastic surgery (American Board), otolaryngology credentials (Royal College and US Board), and an assistant professorship at the University of Toronto. They list over two decades of practice and serve the Greater Toronto Area and international clients.