Breast Augmentation & Breast Surgery in Ontario

Nurse Kaela has built strong trust through careful technique and honest counsel. Reviewers return repeatedly for lip fillers and injectables, praising her restraint against over-treatment and her warm, professional manner in a bright, clean space.

Five-star reviewers praise Dr. De Kleer's surgical skill, clear communication, and Michele's expertise with injectables; post-op care from nurses like Karen and Nurse Gottwald is frequently highlighted. However, one-star reviewers report serious surgical botches (breast reduction requiring in-home nursing, submental liposuction causing new lumps 1.5 years later), dismissal of complications, and upselling of treatments that caused permanent scarring, with management refusing to address complaints. The clinic excels in non-surgical services like CoolSculpting and laser treatments for engaged patients. Surgery appears to carry significant risk with this practice, based on multiple accounts of avoidable harm and lack of accountability.

Patients report Dr. Atiyah delivers skilled surgical results and genuine care through most interactions, with Nicole consistently praised for warm, responsive support. However, a handful describe him as dismissive during consultations, and one family experienced tension over work-injury documentation and perceived insensitivity, raising questions about consistency in patient respect across complex cases.

Strong results and team care draw patients, particularly for reconstructive work and cancer-related surgery. However, a vocal minority report poor results, lack of aesthetic consultation, and brusque communication-especially around breast procedures and complex cases outside the surgeon's stated focus.

Strong surgeons, inconsistent patient experience. Dr. Weinberg earns consistent praise for reconstructive work, breast surgery, and noticeable results; multiple patients report traveling from across the GTA and calling him an artist. However, a meaningful minority experienced dismissive, rushed, or outright rude encounters during consultations and follow-ups, with some complaints going unresolved for months. Aftercare stands out when it happens: detailed post-op instructions, email access to the doctor, monthly check-ins. Yet a few reviews note the doctor rushed through post-op appointments or refused to address specific concerns. The team includes a responsive coordinator called Sandy, though front-desk communication can falter.

Strong majority of patients report excellent results and comfort under Dr. Gallant's care, with particular praise for body contouring and breast surgery outcomes. However, several reviewers describe insensitive consultations and unaddressed post-operative complications, suggesting inconsistency in patient care and communication.

Most patients praise Dr. Leila Kasrai's surgical skill and her attentive, patient approach; staff members Eva and Helen are consistently named as warm and responsive. A small fraction report serious communication failures during post-operative complications, including inadequate emergency guidance and insufficient advance explanation of procedures.

Five-star reviews praise Dr. Brownrigg's rhinoplasties and non-surgical work (Botox noted as consistently excellent), plus scar-prevention expertise. One-star reviews center on rhinoplasties that looked unchanged from pre-surgery, despite 3D imaging promises and thousands spent. Patients reported steroid injections offered but ineffective, and say concerns were dismissed rather than addressed constructively. Evidence is thin overall: detail limited to recent rhinoplasty failures, Botox praise, facelift satisfaction, and reconstructive breathing improvements.

A split record: older five-star reviews praise the surgical team's skill and bedside manner, especially for post-weight-loss reconstruction. Recent one-star reviews report significant scar and body contouring regrets years later, with patients turned away to other surgeons for revision work.

Two five-star reviews praise Dr. Tutino's gyno surgery results, noting nearly invisible scarring and normal appearance. Staff accommodate scheduling quickly despite busy schedule; Dr. Tutino stays available to patients throughout care.

All five reviews praise Dr. Gantous for rhinoplasty work, noting his technical precision and attentive approach. Patients highlight his use of 3D imaging, detailed preoperative counselling, responsive email communication, and willingness to combine procedures when beneficial to facial balance.

Reviewers praise Dr. Wanzel's surgical skill, particularly for breast procedures and minor hand surgery, along with his calm bedside manner and the responsiveness of his front desk staff. However, communication gaps are persistent: several complain of weeks-long appointment waits, unreturned calls, and unanswered emails, while a few report disappointing results or post-operative complications.

Half of reviews are glowing accounts of life-changing breathing improvements and warm surgical experiences, while the other half describe prolonged post-op complications, dismissive follow-up care, and a surgeon perceived as uncaring toward outcomes. Patients on OHIP coverage report especially poor treatment and difficulty accessing revision help; those paying privately appear more satisfied overall.

All ten reviews rate Aestheticare five stars. Patients return for Dr. Lozenski's refusal to over-treat and her staff's warmth; acne and skin concerns improve markedly with peels and IPL.

Dr. Zorn draws strong praise for her surgical skill, especially in breast reduction and reconstructive work spanning decades; patients report transformative results and appreciate her direct, no-nonsense approach. However, chronic wait times (hours beyond appointment), communication gaps when cancelling, and a blunt manner that alienates those seeking warmth create significant friction for a substantial minority of patients.

Most patients describe transformative experiences with McLean's warm, attentive team and skilled surgeons, particularly for gender-affirming top surgery. One significant negative review documented surgical complications (asymmetry, nipple stretching, dog ears) that the patient felt were neither discussed beforehand nor adequately addressed during follow-up, tempting buyers to probe pre-op conversations about expected outcomes and revision policies.

Reviewers consistently praise Dr. Roumeliotis and his team for managing complex facial reconstruction after trauma, with particular note of emotional support during recovery. Limited review detail prevents assessment of broader service quality, wait times, or cosmetic procedure outcomes.

Most patients praise Dr. Ejaz and Dr. Ammara Ghumman for calm, attentive care and smooth minor procedures with minimal pain and clear aftercare. The clinic feels clean, organized, and responsive to concerns. However, multiple reviewers report feeling pressured into unnecessary procedures with misleading claims about cost and OHIP eligibility. Quoted prices for lipoma and cyst removal were substantially higher than elsewhere. Trust issues arise when clinical judgment appears profit-driven rather than patient-first.

Staff earn consistent praise for warmth and attentiveness across consultations, recovery, and follow-up. However, two older reviews flag communication breakdowns and lost records; one patient waited two years without response on a revision after a surgeon left.

Experienced rhinoplasty surgeon with a devoted following who report natural, long-lasting results and high confidence in his work. Significant cluster of unhappy revision patients, however, describe feeling unheard during consultations, repeat visits without tangible improvement, and disorganization in post-op care and communication.

All 15 reviews are five-star. Patients consistently report that Dr. Best listens carefully, explains procedures clearly, and delivers results that exceed expectations-from rhinoplasty breathing improvements to nearly invisible scar revision. Her team, including assistant Shanthi, creates a welcoming clinic atmosphere.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Wallman's surgical skill, attentiveness to concerns, and caring staff. Several report life-changing results in breast and eyelid work. However, a meaningful minority describe unmet expectations (breast reductions smaller than requested), long-term complications requiring revision elsewhere, and receptionist friction. High cost compounds disappointment when results fall short. Clear gaps exist between positive and negative accounts. Some attribute complications to patient selection or recovery variability; others feel dismissed when raising concerns. Staff quality is praised in many reviews but questioned in others.

Both reviewers praise Dr. Mark Baily and staff member Karyn for genuine care and detailed explanations before and after procedures. Long-term focus on patient comfort and pain relief, with responsive aftercare support.

Two patients reported strong satisfaction years after chin and eyelid surgery, citing Dr. Fialkov's technical skill, thoughtful approach, and supportive office environment. Limited review volume constrains broader assessment.

The clinic divides sharply. Patients treated by Dr. Rathee or in shorter-wait visits praise genuine listening and effective treatment; Dr. Mani Raman receives consistent complaints of rudeness, dismissiveness, and appointments that last 3-5 minutes despite 40-minute-plus waits. The core frustration is the gap between long wait times and very brief time with the doctor. Staff and front-desk issues compound the problem. Booking calls go unanswered, appointment administration makes errors, and the clinic seems aware of wait times but takes no meaningful action. A few patients report pleasant, punctual experiences, but they are far outnumbered by those who feel unheard, rushed, and disrespected.

Most patients report smooth extractions and compassionate aftercare, with staff following up by phone the next day. One serious complaint documents life-threatening complications from wisdom surgery years ago, where the patient's parent requested hospital care but was reassured the clinic was safe; post-operative problems required emergency hospitalization. The business appears to be primarily dental (extractions, wisdom teeth removal) despite directory listing under cosmetic/plastic surgery categories.

Reviewers split sharply on Dr. Overduin's practice. Five-star patients praise her carpal tunnel releases, mole removals, and minor skin surgery as quick and well-healed, with staff described as respectful and thorough. A significant minority report serious concerns: surgical scissors left unsealed on trays, discriminatory treatment based on race or religion, poor follow-up after complications, last-minute scheduling, and aggressive office conduct when questioned. The practice handles hand surgery and reconstructive cases competently according to satisfied patients, but operational issues and documented incidents of discrimination and sanitation lapses dominate negative accounts. One patient detailed ongoing complications from trigger finger surgery met with minimal support, and multiple reviewers noted the aging facility lacks privacy and professional polish.

Limited review evidence: two five-star ratings over 8 years praise Dr. Bailey's empathy and a staff member named Guri, but concrete details about services or results are sparse.

Tanya at TBT delivers consistent results with Dysport, Botox, and Morpheus8 treatments in a welcoming clinic. Most clients report she listens carefully and avoids overselling; a small minority experienced missed appointments and excessive injectables causing discomfort and confusion about dosing.

Strong track record across multiple procedures: breast surgery, hand reconstruction, and body contouring earn consistent five-star praise for technical skill and staff warmth. Office is clean and attentive during consultations, though some patients report minimal post-op guidance after hand work and past friction over deposit policies.

Five-star reviews praise Dr. Haywood's surgical skill and warm approach, especially for breast reduction, with patients noting excellent scars and seamless experiences. One-star reviews flag delayed communication on post-op problems, rushed appointments, and inconsistent follow-up support when complications arose.

Outcomes divide sharply. Some patients report excellent long-term results from breast reduction, tummy tuck, and reconstruction. Others faced rude interactions, year-long silence between consultation and surgery date, botched procedures (inverted nipples, uneven abdomen, thick scars), and refusals to correct problems. The office mixes up appointments, keeps incorrect patient records, and runs severely behind schedule. Review evidence is limited: only 30 texts cover 31 total reviews, with older accounts potentially confusing Dr. Wong with Dr. Vanessa Wong. Recent 1-star reviews cite specific failures (weight-focused pressure, communication breakdown weeks before surgery, no follow-up for 11-year-old surgical errors), while 5-star reviews from 4-6 years ago express strong satisfaction with results. This suggests recent operational or interpersonal decline.

Most reviewers praise the friendly staff and clean environment, with particular mention of smooth iron infusion visits and quick appointment times. One substantial complaint detailed misleading website pricing for rhinoplasty, unauthorized consultation charges, and inability to verify a surgeon's credentials or see his work, though the clinic later refunded the fee.

Dr. Lipa earns consistent five-star reviews for precise surgical work and compassionate care. Evidence is limited: only two reviews, though both highlight her personalized approach and strong bedside manner.

Most satisfied patients praise Dr. Hynes' skill, the staff's warmth (especially Karen at front desk), and smooth healing. Yet serious gaps emerge: one patient experienced asymmetry after abdominoplasty with zero follow-up from the clinic despite repeated contact; phone lines are consistently busy or divert to an unrelated device seller; and complications go unaddressed. Past reviews glow, but recent ones flag a stark decline in accountability and communication. Since review evidence is limited, note that detail provided here reflects only these 17 reviews.

Most patients praise the clinic's cleanliness, friendly staff, and skin treatment outcomes, especially for lasers and peels. A consistent minority report poor phone service and disappointing in-person experiences, with some feeling rushed or unwelcome during consultations.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Dr. Levis delivers hand surgery with lasting pain relief: reviewers report straight fingers after Dupuytren contracture repair, no pain after carpal tunnel work, and full thumb function restored years later. Her team at St. Joseph's is described as compassionate and professional.

Dr. Bell and his team earn consistent praise for breast augmentation, facial surgery, and laser treatments, with patients particularly crediting Shelby for non-surgical work and the staff for making them feel at ease. However, hair transplant reviews reveal a severe divide: several patients report significant complications, pressure during consultation, technician-led procedures, and being charged full price for fewer grafts than promised, with lasting physical and financial consequences.

One five-star review supports this Aurora clinic. Review detail is limited, so specifics about staff skill, results, or experience remain unknown. Their website lists medical aesthetics, facials, body contouring, permanent makeup, and head spa services.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Panchapakesan's technical skill and bedside manner, noting minimal scarring and compassionate care. However, several one- and two-star reviews document serious concerns: wound infections not properly escalated, dismissive phone responses when complications arose, and in one case, a patient's wounds deteriorated after the office recommended continuing unsuccessful treatment. The surgeon himself consistently receives high marks; concerns centre on aftercare response and office management during emergencies.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Chitte's surgical skill, especially for hand trauma and breast reconstruction, noting his patience and careful listening. However, a persistent thread of complaints spans years: delayed or missing referrals to physio and family doctors, unreturned voicemails, and long in-office waits. Administrative friction appears to have worsened after a clinic transition.

One five-star review praises Dr. Strazar for professionalism and pain-free results. Limited review evidence available.

Dr. Hong's surgical skills and staff care earn consistent five-star praise, especially for reconstructive and cosmetic work; patients report feeling heard and supported through complex procedures. However, waits of one to two and a half hours are routine, and reception staff frequently fail to follow through on promises, leaving patients frustrated and distrustful of scheduling accuracy. \n\nReviewers single out the nursing team (especially Lin and Stella) for attentiveness and skill. Dr. Hong himself is described as efficient, observant, and able to explain procedures clearly. Patients note natural results across body contouring, facial work, and gender-affirming procedures. The clinic is located at 302 Sheppard Ave West and operates seven days; staff speak English and Cantonese. Cost is mentioned as reasonable relative to outcomes, but no specific prices appear in reviews.

Most patients report excellent outcomes with rhinoplasty and fillers, praising natural results and caring follow-up. However, a small number describe serious complications: one patient experienced eyelid closure issues and severe dry eye after lower lid surgery, another faced respiratory problems and asymmetry after rhinoplasty, and a third reported infection and unmanaged post-op pain. The polarized reviews (73% five-star, 25% one/two-star) reflect inconsistent surgical results.

Both reviewers report excellent outcomes and attentive care. Evidence is limited to two five-star reviews, but they emphasize surgical skill, listening to patient preferences, and a supportive team.

Only two reviews available, both five-star. Patients praise Dr. Snell as talented and gifted, with one detailing relief from heavy breast pain after breast reduction and lift. Limited evidence for broader patterns.

Dr. Charleton earns consistent praise for surgical skill and honest, empathetic communication, especially with breast cancer patients. Office administration is his weak point: reviewers report missed callbacks, delayed appointment bookings, and staff who don't follow up or apologize for errors.

All eight reviews are five-star. Patients report natural results across surgical and injectable treatments, with praise for Dr. Basil's attention to what they wanted and his team's comfort-focused approach. Work includes facial surgery, rhinoplasty, injectables, and brow/eyelid procedures.

One reviewer praised Dr. Brandt's empathy and subtle technique, noting natural results and thorough guidance. Only limited review data exists; a one-star review is also on record, suggesting mixed patient experience.

Surgical outcomes and Dr. Platt's expertise draw consistent five-star praise. Yet a polarized rating split (48% five-star, 48% one-two-star) reflects deep frustration with front desk conduct. Patients report exceptional care during consultations and procedures, but encounter rude, dismissive receptionists, ignored voicemails, and refusal to send confirmation emails. Receptionist Evelyn receives individual praise when involved; other staff create barriers to booking and follow-up.

Three reviewers over a decade old consistently praise Dr. Callaghan for making them feel secure during breast augmentation, from initial consult through recovery. Surgery outcomes were strong, staff attentive throughout, and the surgeon personally invested in executing exactly what patients requested.

One repeat client credits laser acne therapy with lasting confidence gains, praising technician Hailey C. for clear communication. Another reports expensive, ineffective spot removal and suspects bias against darker skin tones.

Patients report stark contrasts: some experienced compassionate, meticulous care through major reconstructive surgery, while others faced uneven body-contouring results, delayed revisions, and communication breakdowns that required legal involvement. Evidence is limited to a handful of recent reviews.

One five-star review praised the phone experience and felt heard, though no service details emerged yet. Evidence is thin.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Dr. Zhang's surgical skill, especially in microsurgery and scar minimization, earns strong praise from patients satisfied with reconstruction outcomes. However, multiple reviewers report abrupt, dismissive, or condescending interactions during consultations and procedures, incomplete postop communication, and follow-up that sometimes fell short of promises.

Some patients credit Dr. Li and Dr. Cheang with skilled, thorough surgical care and a supportive team. Others describe dismissive doctors who miss serious symptoms and chaotic appointment management that leaves patients frustrated and waiting well past their scheduled time.

Review evidence is limited. The business holds a 3.0 average across 2 Google reviews with a sharp split between five-star and one/two-star ratings, signaling inconsistent experiences.

One patient reported a successful minor procedure that boosted confidence. However, most reviews describe arrogant behavior, botched cosmetic work that worsened the original condition, refusal to refund, and pricing confusion. Evidence is limited but strongly negative.

Strong track record on minor procedures like cysts and moles, with patients praising clean technique and patient comfort. However, a significant subset report serious problems: one cyst regrew after incomplete removal, another keloid worsened, and an older review alleges major body contouring failures. Wait times and receptionist responsiveness vary widely.

Strong results on body and facial procedures from certain surgeons offset by mixed experiences with wait times, pricing clarity, and some surgical complications. Injections and chemical peels consistently praised; administrative friction and old satellite locations mentioned by reviewers.

Long waits, dismissive care, and hostile administrative encounters dominate feedback. When seen, the doctor can perform thorough exams, but reviews describe inadequate explanations, rushed appointments, and a receptionist staff that many found rude or disrespectful. Post-operative pain went unmanaged in some cases. The 2.3 rating reflects severe dissatisfaction across most reviewers.

Five-star patients credit Dr. Kim with skilled hand and wrist surgery that resolved chronic pain and restored function, though one complicated case involved a bone graft. However, half the reviews are one-star: patients report unresponsive office staff, weeks without contact after referrals, judgmental interactions during appointments, and dismissive treatment of concerns. One patient was charged a $50 no-show fee despite canceling by voicemail and was later denied treatment. The split sentiment suggests capable surgical work undermined by communication failures and poor office management.

Five-star reviewers praise Dr. Lista's expertise and staff warmth, but negative reviews spanning years dominate: botched breast augmentations, infections left untreated, 45-minute to 90-minute waits without updates, and a pattern of dismissive behavior during consultations. Several patients report sagging, asymmetry, or uneven scarring months to years post-op, and costs escalate sharply from phone quotes ($14,000) to final bills ($26,555+).

Most patients report strong results and warm staff interactions, particularly from named team members Liz, Diana, Shannon, and Jenn. However, a handful of older reviews flag inconsistent bedside manner during consultations and revision surgeries, especially with ear procedures.

Nearly every recent reviewer describes an inaccessible, dismissive clinic. Phone lines go unanswered, voicemails are ignored, and when patients do reach Dr. Gupta, many report he rushes appointments, dismisses concerns, or delays critical medical results by months. One patient waited six months for a cancer diagnosis; another had a botched biopsy. Only a handful of older reviews praise professionalism, but the overwhelming pattern is poor communication and lack of care.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Overwhelmingly poor reviews describe a clinic marked by extensive wait times, poor listening skills, and unhappy surgical outcomes. One outdated five-star review praised quick nasal bone correction, but seven recent one-star reviews report botched rhinoplasties, staff rudeness, and Dr. Hacker's dismissal of patient concerns.

Dr. Turley receives consistently strong praise for bedside manner and reconstructive hand surgery, with several patients reporting excellent healing from trauma and functional repairs. However, a vocal minority report poor cosmetic results, overly deep incisions for minor procedures, and significant office access issues. The clinic's automated phone system does not accept messages, and multiple patients describe arriving to find the office closed during posted hours or being turned away after surgeries were cancelled.

Dr. Fiaz performs routine surgical procedures with skill and attentiveness, and the clinic's weekend availability draws gratitude. Office operations are inconsistent: some patients report five-minute waits and spa-like calm, while others describe hour-plus delays, no receptionist, and overcrowding with no courtesy calls.

Over six years of reviews show this clinic loses patients fast: long-term patients report the doctor grew less attentive, staff refuse walk-ins and don't answer phones, and both receptionist and doctor are widely described as rude and dismissive. A few older reviews praise cleanliness and quick service, but the recent pattern is consistent neglect of basic patient communication and respect.

Long-term patients report solid outcomes from breast reduction and carpal tunnel work, with one praising swift recovery after following post-op advice. A separate breast augmentation case involved complications and alleged dismissal of concerns, with the patient seeking a second opinion elsewhere.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Front desk staff, particularly Neha, earn consistent praise for warmth and professionalism. However, the clinic's core operations are severely strained. Waits stretch from 30 minutes to over 4 hours with little communication, appointments vanish from records without notice, and receptionists reportedly raise their voices and deflect responsibility. Serious care gaps emerge when patients need urgent medical attention or follow-up: one pregnant patient was abandoned after missing a booked phone call and told it was "not their responsibility" to order tests. One doctor is described as rude and rough, and cosmetic consultations reportedly prioritize sales over genuine assessment.

A minority of patients report Dr. Malik's directness and clinical skill as reassuring, praising his follow-up care and professional knowledge. However, the vast majority describe a doctor who is dismissive of patient concerns, rude, and pressuring-with serious complaints about hernia surgery complications, mishandled breast biopsies, and a fundamental lack of empathy that leaves patients feeling hurt and unheard.

Limited review evidence available for Verso Surgery. The business operates as a fully licensed facility in Old Toronto, offering facial and body procedures including facelift, rhinoplasty, breast augmentation, and non-surgical options.

Review evidence is limited. The business operates as a cosmetic and gender-affirming surgery clinic in Old Toronto, holding F.R.C.S.C. credentials and offering body contouring, breast surgery, and related procedures across the Toronto area.

Review evidence is limited. Verso Surgery Centre operates from North York with services spanning facial procedures (facelift, rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty), breast surgery, and injectables. Their website claims 20+ years of operating history under Dr. Jack Kolenda and a licensed, state-of-the-art facility.

Review evidence is limited. The business states it is board-certified with over 23 years of surgical experience, hospital privileges at three major Ontario networks, and past leadership in plastic surgery. Services span body contouring, breast surgery, non-surgical cosmetics, and gender-affirming procedures across the GTA and beyond.

No individual review text is available to assess patient experiences directly. The business claims 31+ years of operation, holds multiple surgical certifications (DABHRS, FISHRS, DABD), and states it won Consumer's Choice Awards and an ISHRS Platinum Follicle Award.

Limited review evidence available. The business claims board certification in facial plastic surgery (American Board), otolaryngology credentials (Royal College and US Board), and an assistant professorship at the University of Toronto. They list over two decades of practice and serve the Greater Toronto Area and international clients.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Review evidence is limited; no review text available for analysis. AccuMedic offers non-surgical and surgical cosmetic services from their Oakville location.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.